TitleComparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
AuthorsZhang, Hua
Li, Nan
Yang, Qiu-Ling
Qiu, Wei
Zhu, Liang-Liang
Tao, Li-Yuan
Davis, Robert I.
Heyer, Nicholas
Zhao, Yi-Ming
AffiliationPeking Univ, Hosp 3, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China.
Dongfeng Inst Occupat Dis Prevent, Shi Yan 442001, Hubei, Peoples R China.
SUNY Coll Plattsburgh, Auditory Res Lab, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA.
Battelle Ctr Publ Hlth Res & Evaluat, Seattle, WA USA.
KeywordsComplex Noise
Cumulative Noise Exposure
Dose-response Relationship
Noise Exposure Evaluation
Workgroup
COMPLEX NOISE
RISK
THRESHOLDS
WORKERS
Issue Date2015
PublisherChinese Medical Journal
CitationCHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL.2015,128,(6),816-821.
AbstractBackground: Complex noise and its relation to hearing loss are difficult to measure and evaluate. In complex noise measurement, individual exposure results may not accurately represent lifetime noise exposure. Thus, the mean L-Aeq,L-8h values of individuals in the same workgroup were also used to represent L-Aeq,L-8 h in our study. Our study aimed to explore whether the mean exposure levels of workers in the same workgroup represented real noise exposure better than individual exposure levels did. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to establish a model for cumulative noise exposure (CNE) and hearing loss in 205 occupational noise-exposed workers who were recruited from two large automobile manufacturers in China. We used a personal noise dosimeter and a questionnaire to determine the workers' occupational noise exposure levels and exposure times, respectively. A qualified audiologist used standardized audiometric procedures to assess hearing acuity after at least 16 h of noise avoidance. Results: We observed that 88.3% of workers were exposed to more than 85 dB(A) of occupational noise (mean: 89.3 +/- 4.2 dB(A)). The personal CNE (CNEp) and workgroup CNE (CNEg) were 100.5 +/- 4.7 dB(A) and 100.5 +/- 2.9 dB(A), respectively. In the binary logistic regression analysis, we established a regression model with high-frequency hearing loss as the dependent variable and CNE as the independent variable. The Wald value was 5.014 with CNEp as the independent variable and 8.653 with CNEg as the independent variable. Furthermore, we found that the figure for CNEg was more similar to the stationary noise reference than CNEp was. The CNEg model was better than the CNEp model. In this circumstance, we can measure some subjects instead of the whole workgroup and save manpower. Conclusions: In a complex noise environment, the measurements of average noise exposure level of the workgroup can improve the accuracy and save manpower.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/309125
ISSN0366-6999
DOI10.4103/0366-6999.152659
IndexedSCI(E)
PubMed
中国科技核心期刊(ISTIC)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
Appears in Collections:第三医院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®



Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™



Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.