Title改良版用药差异评估工具的信度与效度评价
Other TitlesReliability and Validity Evaluation of Modified Medication Discrepancy Tool
Authors王秀英
李英华
肖锟婷
刘宇
李湘萍
Affiliation北京大学护理学院,北京,100191
Keywords用药差异
信度
效度
出院患者
Medication discrepancies
Validity
Reliability
Discharged patient
Issue Date2015
Publisher中国药房
Citation中国药房. 2015, 26(31), 4460-4462.
Abstract目的:评价改良版用药差异评估工具(MDT)的内容效度与评定者间信度.方法:按照英文版MDT的结构,对用药差异的评估条目进行改良,并邀请5名专家采用专家内容效度指数法对MDT进行内容效度检验;采用评定者间信度法检验MDT的信度.另外由2名评定者采用改良版MDT分别对相同的20名研究对象进行评定者间信度检验.结果:改良版MDT所有条目的内容效度值均>0.800,总内容效度值为0.970;各条目的评定者间信度值在0.667~1.000之间(P<0.01),总评定者间信度值为0.840 (P<0.01).结论:改良版MDT具有较好的信度与效度,可用于我国出院过渡期患者用药差异的客观评估.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the content validity and interrater reliability of the modified medication discrepancy tool (MDT). METHODS:According to the structure of MDT(English edition),the terms of MDT were modified,and 5 invited ex-perts used content validity indicator to test the content validity of MDT. The interrater reliability method was adopted to test the reli-ability of MDT. The interrater reliability was performed by 2 evaluators to same 20 research objects with modified MDT. RE-SULTS:Average item-level content validity index was over 0.800,and scale-level content validity index was 0.970. The item-level interrater reliability was between 0.667 and 1.000(P<0.01). The scale-level interrater reliability was 0.840(P<0.01). CONCLU-SIONS:The modified MDT has good content validity and interrater reliability,and can be used to evaluate discharged medication discrepancies in China.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/432481
ISSN1001-0408
DOI10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2015.31.45
Indexed中文核心期刊要目总览(PKU)
中国科技核心期刊(ISTIC)
Appears in Collections:护理学院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®



Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™



Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.