Title不同群体对“患者”和“病人”两词的态度研究
Other TitlesA study on the attitudes of different groups towards the words “Huanzhe” and “Bingren”
Authors胡凤松
李明月
林琳
王智帆
徐嘉琪
张琪
赵忻怡
王岳
Affiliation北京大学医学人文研究院
Keywords医学人文
话语权
患者
病人
Medical humanity
The right to speak
Patient
Issue Date2019
Publisher中国卫生法制
Abstract院士联名提出以"病人"一词取代"患者",称"患者"一词带有殖民主义色彩。"患者"一词经常见诸于医药卫生立法的条文中。为了解这一提议是否具有实际意义,我们通过问卷调查方式分别采集了大学生、医务工作者和普通民众的意见,并用Excel录入数据,用统计软件SPSS进行分析。分析结果显示,这一提议并不具有实际意义。话语权应该以广大人民群众为中心,群众的意见建议是决策的来源和灵感所在,不应因词汇带有外族文化色彩而予以抵制。在日后的立法中(例如近期国务院颁布的《医疗纠纷预防与处理条例》)应当继续延用"患者"的称谓。
Some academicians suggested changing the Chinese word "bingren"into "huanzhe"because they claimed that the word"huanzhe"implying the meaning of colonialism.The term "huanzhe" is often used in the context of health legislation.In order to examine whether academicians' suggestion is practical,we collected opinions from college students,medical workers and common people.We recorded the data by Excel,and analyzed with SPSS.After analysis,we believed that academicians' suggestion were not practical.The right to speak should be centered on common people,whose opinions are the source of decisions and inspirations.Words shouldn't be rejected just because they contain the meaning of other culture.The term " huanzhe" should continue to be used in future legislation,such as the recently promulgated Regulations on the Prevention and Treatment of Medical Disputes.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/560799
ISSN1004-6607
DOI10.19752/j.cnki.1004-6607.2019.02.003
Appears in Collections:医学人文学院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®



Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™



Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.