Title | Different Coagulation Indicators in Predicting Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
Authors | Liu, Zhiyan Zhang, Hanxu Xie, Qiufen Mu, Guangyan Zhou, Shuang Wang, Zining Wang, Zhe Jiang, Jie Xiang, Qian Cui, Yimin |
Affiliation | Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Pharm, 6 Dahongluochang St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China |
Keywords | DIRECT THROMBIN INHIBITOR TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS JAPANESE PATIENTS PROTHROMBIN TIME LABORATORY MEASUREMENT LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY MEASURING RIVAROXABAN DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE ISCHEMIC-STROKE |
Issue Date | Oct-2020 |
Publisher | CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS |
Abstract | Purpose: There are many anticoagulant test indexes available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but how to select the appropriate index and the index cutoff values are still controversial. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess the association of different coagulation indicators with clinical outcomes among DOACs using a meta-analysis of observational studies. Methods: A medical literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2020. Studies that reported relationships between coagulation indexes and clinical outcomes or the diagnostic value of coagulation assays were included in the analysis. Findings: A total of 17 articles (7 meta-analyses and 10 systematic reviews) from 8904 citations were included in the analysis. In the analysis of bleeding events with coagulation indexes for DOACs, for peak prothrombin time level (cutoff value of 19-25 s), the pooled results found a sensitivity of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.44-0.75) and a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-0.86). For rivaroxaban, the trough anti-factor Xa concentration (AXA-C) (cutoff value of 400-500 ng/mL) had a sensitivity of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.16-0.87) and a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 7 (95% CI, 2-32). For apixaban, trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.60-0.96) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.52-0.95). The AUC of the AXA-C peak was higher than that of the trough AXA-C for apixaban, with a higher sensitivity and specificity. Compared with trough concentration of anti-factor IIa for dabigatran, the peak concentration had a higher specificity (98%) at the cutoff value of 484 ng/mL. In the analysis of thromboembolic events with coagulation indexes for DOACs, peak and trough prothrombin time values were not typically correlated with subsequent symptomatic venous thromboembolism, without a sensitivity or specificity higher than 90%. Trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 100% and but a low specificity (<50%) for rivaroxaban-apixaban. Trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 32% with a cutoff value of 108 ng/mL for dabigatran. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/601928 |
ISSN | 0149-2918 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.08.001 |
Indexed | SCI(E) |
Appears in Collections: | 第一医院 |