TitleA systematic review and meta-analysis of discharged COVID-19 patients retesting positive for RT-PCR
AuthorsRen, Xiangying
Ren, Xiangge
Lou, Jiaao
Wang, Yongbo
Huang, Qiao
Shi, Yuexian
Deng, Yuqing
Li, Xiaoyan
Lu, Liye
Yan, Siyu
Wang, Yunyun
Luo, Lisha
Zeng, Xiantao
Yao, Xiaomei
Jin, Yinghui
AffiliationWuhan Univ, Ctr Evidence Based & Translat Med, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan, Peoples R China
Henan Univ, Coll Nursing & Hlth, Kaifeng, Henan, Peoples R China
Henan Univ Chinese Med, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Med, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Sch Nursing, Beijing, Peoples R China
Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Thyroid Breast Surg, Wuhan, Peoples R China
Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Nephrol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
Yongnian Dist Matern & Childcare Hosp, Xinming Rd 28 Yongnian Dist, Handan, Hebei, Peoples R China
Fudan Univ, Ctr Clin Practice Guideline Conduct & Evaluat, Childrens Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
KeywordsCORONAVIRUS
SARS-COV-2
PNEUMONIA
AGAIN
RNA
CT
Issue DateApr-2021
PublisherECLINICALMEDICINE
AbstractBackground: With the increased number of patients discharged after having COVID-19, more and more studies have reported cases whose retesting was positive (RP) during the convalescent period, which brings a new public health challenge to the world. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang and VIP from December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. The included studies were assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The RP rate of discharge patients was analyzed by a meta-analysis. We adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. Findings: We have included 117 studies with 2669 RP participants after discharge. The methodological quality of 66 case reports were low to high, 42 case series and 3 cohort study were moderate to high, 3 case-control studies were moderate and 3 cross-sectional studies were low to moderate. The clinical manifestations of most RP patients were mild or asymptomatic, and CT imaging and laboratory examinations were usually normal. The existing risk factors suggest that more attention should be paid to sever patients, elderly patients, and patients with co-morbidities. The summary RP rate was 12.2% (95% CI 10.6-13.7) with high heterogeneity (I-2 = 85%). Interpretation: To date, the causes and risk factors of RP result in discharged patients are not fully understood. High-quality etiological and clinical studies are needed to investigate these issues to further help us to make strategies to control and prevent its occurrence. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/613851
DOI10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100839
IndexedSCI(E)
Appears in Collections:护理学院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®



Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™



Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.