TitleMetasemantics and boydian synthetic moral naturalism
AuthorsZhao, Xinkan
AffiliationPeking Univ, Inst Foreign Philosophy, Dept Philosophy, 5 Yihe Yuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
Issue DateJun-2021
PublisherSYNTHESE
AbstractThis paper argues against Boydian synthetic moral naturalism by way of a critical examination at metasemantic issues. I first show that the Boydian metasemantics delivers determinate but wrong reference, building on an analysis by Schroeter and Schroeter. I then propose a diagnosis which says that the problem occurs due to an overly simple way of understanding externalist metasemantics, and that a proper understanding requires us to pay heed to the higher-level constraints set by the speakers' deferring pattern. That in turn is restricted by what I call reference defeaters, which are essentially some central beliefs held by the speakers and are so called because they have the power to defeat reference of a term to certain things. Applying the notion to moral discourse, I argue that the entrenched is/ought distinction held by the ordinary speakers defeats the reference of the moral predicates to natural properties, that is, synthetic moral naturalism is not true.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/618352
ISSN0039-7857
DOI10.1007/s11229-021-03283-5
IndexedA&HCI
SCI(E)
SSCI
Appears in Collections:哲学系(宗教学系)

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®



Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™



Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.