TitleAge, gender, geographic and clinical differences for gallstones in China: a nationwide study
AuthorsSong, Yang
Ma, Yuan
Xie, Fu-Cun
Jin, Cheng
Yang, Xiao-Bo
Yang, Xu
Long, Jun-Yu
Wang, Dong-Xu
Sang, Xin-Ting
Li, Li-Ming
Zhao, Hai-Tao
Ning, Yi
AffiliationPeking Union Med Coll Hosp, Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Liver Surg, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Meinian Publ Hlth Inst, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Sch Populat Med & Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
KeywordsRISK-FACTORS
GALLBLADDER-DISEASE
PRACTICE GUIDELINES
DIGESTIVE DISEASES
BILIARY-TRACT
PREVALENCE
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA
HEPATOLITHIASIS
EPIDEMIOLOGY
POPULATION
Issue DateMay-2022
PublisherANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
AbstractBackground: The etiology of gallstones at different anatomical locations may be varied. However, it has not been well studied about the prevalence of gallstones by anatomical locations and their associated factors in China. Methods: We used the data set from preventive health screening centers covering all provinces in mainland China except for Tibet, and a total of 10,937,993 adults were included, who received abdominal ultrasonography in 2017. We analyzed the prevalence of gallstones classified by anatomical locations, including gallbladder (GB) stones, intrahepatic bile duct (IHD) stones, and extrahepatic bile duct (EHD) stones. Further, their associated factors were investigated using a logistic regression model with body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose, total triglyceride, and previous cholecystectomy, with covariates of age and sex. Results: The age- and gender-standardized prevalence (AGS-prevalence) of gallstone diseases was 5.13% (95% CI: 5.11-5.14%). GB, IHD, and EHD stones accounted for 76.3%, 24.3%, and 0.2% of all gallstone cases (concomitant cases were present). GB, IHD, and EHD gallstones presented different patterns by the age, gender, geographic and metabolic factors. Overall, the age-standardized prevalence was higher in women than that in men (5.41% vs. 4.85%, P<0.001). The gender standardized prevalence of all gallstone subtypes apparently increased with age (P<0.001), especially for GB stones from 1.05% (age 18-30) to 11.6% (age >= 70) (P<0.001). There was a marked geographic variation with AGS-prevalence ranging from 3.00% to 8.86% among different provinces. Noticeably, higher BM!, fasting glucose level, or total triglyceride level was associated with a higher prevalence of overall gallstones and GB stones (OR >1), but associated with a lower prevalence of II ID and EHD stones. Conclusions: The prevalence of gallstones in China largely varied in its anatomical location, demographic factors, geographic location, and metabolic factors, suggesting that the etiology of each subtype may be different. Further investigation should be conducted.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/648262
ISSN2305-5839
DOI10.21037/atm-21-6186
IndexedSCI(E)
Appears in Collections:公共卫生学院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®



Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™



Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.