Title | Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Resilience and Resistance of Global Vegetation Responses to Climate Change |
Authors | Sun, Na Liu, Naijing Zhao, Xiang Zhao, Jiacheng Wang, Haoyu Wu, Donghai |
Affiliation | Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Chinese Acad Sci,Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Remote Sensing Sci & Engn, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Global Land Remote Sensing P, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China Peking Univ, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA |
Keywords | TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS CARBON DROUGHT TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY PATTERNS FOREST PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES MORTALITY |
Issue Date | Sep-2022 |
Publisher | REMOTE SENSING |
Abstract | The quantitative assessment of vegetation resilience and resistance is worthwhile to deeply understand the responses of vegetation growth to climate anomalies. However, few studies comprehensively evaluate the spatiotemporal resilience and resistance of global vegetation responses to climate change (i.e., temperature, precipitation, and radiation). Furthermore, although ecosystem models are widely used to simulate global vegetation dynamics, it is still not clear whether ecosystem models can capture observation-based vegetation resilience and resistance. In this study, based on remotely sensed and model-simulated leaf area index (LAI) time series and climate datasets, we quantified spatial patterns and temporal changes in vegetation resilience and resistance from 1982-2015. The results reveal clear spatial patterns of observation-based vegetation resilience and resistance for the last three decades, which were closely related to the local environment. In general, most of the ecosystem models capture spatial patterns of vegetation resistance to climate to different extents at the grid scale (R = 0.43 +/- 0.10 for temperature, R = 0.28 +/- 0.12 for precipitation, and R = 0.22 +/- 0.08 for radiation); however, they are unable to capture patterns of vegetation resilience (R = 0.05 +/- 0.17). Furthermore, vegetation resilience and resistance to climate change have regionally changed over the last three decades. In particular, the results suggest that vegetation resilience has increased in tropical forests and that vegetation resistance to temperature has increased in northern Eurasia. In contrast, ecosystem models cannot capture changes in vegetation resilience and resistance over the past thirty years. Overall, this study establishes a benchmark of vegetation resilience and resistance to climate change at the global scale, which is useful for further understanding ecological mechanisms of vegetation dynamics and improving ecosystem models, especially for dynamic resilience and resistance. |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/654357 |
DOI | 10.3390/rs14174332 |
Indexed | SCI(E) |
Appears in Collections: | 地球与空间科学学院 |